1. How were they structurally similar and
different?
2.
What do you think were the three major aspects
of rhetorical analysis essay (ad analysis)?
3.
What do you think are the three major aspects of
evaluation argument?
4.
What did you learn from the two major
assignments?
1.
Both papers had the same basic structure beginning
with a thesis and expanding from there, hitting on each criteria mentioned in
the thesis and providing evidence to support (classical structure). Both use
analysis and argument (both evaluation). Different: Had to use information from
other sources in the second paper, used citation.
2.
Making a
logical argument, becoming familiar with new terms such as ethos, logos,
pathos, and Kairos, and using precision and clarity in our argument.
3.
Evaluating an artifact without bias, citing
information from other sources, and narrowing our category and criteria down
well.
4.
I learned the term Kairos and became more
familiar with ethos, pathos, and logos.
No comments:
Post a Comment